Slough council leader to stay following failed vote of no confidence

Adrian Williams

Adrian Williams
Slough council leader to stay following failed vote of no confidence

The leader of Slough Borough Council, James Swindlehurst

A motion to remove the leader of Slough Borough Council was quashed in a meeting on Thursday night.

Opposition councillors said that Councillor James Swindlehurst’s leadership had brought the council to ‘financial ruin’ and displayed either ‘wilful ignorance’ or ‘incompetence.’

A Section 114 notice was issued earlier this month after it was revealed that the council faced a £159 million decifit by 2024/25 if drastic action was not taken.

At the meeting, the opposition said that Cllr Swindlehurst (Lab, Cippenham Green) had ‘pushed’ the council to undertake projects it did not have the resources to afford.

“He justifies this by calling his recklessness ‘ambition,’” said Cllr Dexter Smith (Con, Colnbrook with Poyle).

“Slough Borough Council’s debt has doubled and doubled again under his leadership.”

Independent Cllr Madhuri Bedi (Foxborough) said the council had spent tens of millions of pounds on ‘unnecessary vanity projects’ it could not afford, including Observatory House, the new council offices.

Cllr Swindlehurst defended his position and said he had previously offered to tender his resignation as leader to the Labour group in reparation.

But the opposition criticised this, saying that he was accountable to the people of Slough more broadly, not just his own group.

Labour councillors supported their leader, saying that he was the right person to lead the council out of its financial crisis.

They added that it would be a mistake to add political uncertainty to the equation.

Cllr Rob Anderson (Lab, Britwell and Northborough) described the motion as ‘pointless’ and said the council should look to work together, rather than fighting ‘phony political wars.’

The motion to oust the leader was rejected, with the lion's share of the votes against.

Cllr Swindlehurst said: “For all the things that have gone wrong, I am profoundly sorry.”

But he added that the opposition had been against him from the start and was ‘baying for blood’.

“Changing my face as leader will not change the administration. We have an obligation to people who did vote for us,” he said.

Later in the meeting, leader of the Conservatives, Cllr Wayne Strutton (Haymill and Lynch Hill), said:

“I think this whole chamber should consider resigning at the end of this political year and giving this town the opportunity to select every single one of us again in May. Not just a third of us – everyone.”

Unusually, the meeting did not contain an exclusion of the public for discussions usually held in private – including those about council officers.

For transparency, the chamber agreed that the public should hear a motion on whether to call for disciplinary action against the chief executive of the council.

Cllr Martin Carter (Lab, Britwell and Northborough) made an amendment which committed to setting out ‘revised expectations’ for the chief executive, but removed the request for investigation by the disciplinary committee.

“Blame on individuals may make a good story, but it does not help us with the immediate financial issues at hand,” said Cllr Carter.

“The original motion loses sight of the work already underway and misses the effort put in by officers and members alike to show that we are taking the necessary steps.”

He added that the original motion could have left the council open to a financial challenge at employment tribunal.

“This amendment will bring stability, not chaos,” he said.

The amended motion was passed with a majority in favour.

Leave your comment

Share your opinions on

Characters left: 1500


  • SpeakasIfind

    14:25, 27 July 2021

    I'm disgusted to see that despite wasting hundreds of millions of pounds of taxpayers money, the Labour controlled council are still there - THEY HAVE NO SHAME! Can I please ask that the local newspapers to hold the council accountable? Actually chase the facts, rather than just report the story. Is there a list of all the expensive projects that the council have signed off and find out if we (the taxpayers) were indeed ripped off? There have ben several projects that come to mind, but I'd like to know what every project cost and if we were paying more than the going rate. Come to think of it... The Farnham Road Centre, has recently opened, how much did that cost? Why was the "not-so-old" Centre knocked down? I think Slough Council have been very frivilous with Tax payers money, and i have zero confidence in them to claw back the money. I cannot believe that despite bankrupting an entire town, no-one has resigned or been sacked from their posts. Are we able to review their salaries/bonuses? The certainly do not deserve their bonuses and should pay back what they have received.



Editor's Picks

Most read

Top Articles