Wed, 18
14 °C
Thu, 19
16 °C
Fri, 20
14 °C

Musings from the editor's chair: The good, the bad, and the Dudley

Martin Trepte

Martin Trepte

Extra £1.5m agreed for waterways scheme to avoid 'channel of mud'

An extra £1.5 million has been allocated for the Maidenhead Waterways scheme

Those who suspect RBWM is run by a bunch of cowboys may feel their fears were confirmed by an unfortunate metaphor used by a senior councillor last week.

Discussing the need to borrow an extra £1.5million to bail out the over-budget and behind-schedule waterways restoration project, the cabinet member for finance told a meeting: ‘We got on the back of this bucking bronco and we tethered it into submission. It’s our project management skills which have kept tight to the reins’.

Tough talk, pardner. But surely ‘keeping tight to the reins’ should have resulted in said bronco coming in on time and on budget? The councillor’s rodeo skills obviously don’t extend as far as riding the elephant in the room.

Leader of the council Simon Dudley justified the extra borrowing on the grounds the taxpayer will benefit from the gold rush sparked by redeveloping the town centre with hundreds of new flats, fuelled by the coming of the iron horse called Crossrail.

Despite the efforts of the opposition to publicly probe where exactly the wheels had come off RBWM’s waterways wagon, the discussion was held in ‘part II’ of the meeting, from which the public and press are excluded. While we can only speculate on the blame game that went on in secret, it is worth pointing out that, despite the waterways restoration starting as a labour of love for a dedicated group of volunteers, the project itself – including appointing and managing the contractor – is run by RBWM. It really makes you wonder where the scrutiny is? But that’s a subject for a musings all of its own.

So much for the council’s much-vaunted transparency then which, of late, has been so transparent as to be invisible.

The behind-closed-doors meeting is just the latest in a string of recent examples.

First there was RBWM’s refusal to publish the legal advice that led it to extending the public consultation on its deeply flawed Borough Local Plan (BLP). Even more disturbing was the council’s handling of a Local Government Association (LGA) peer review. A team appointed by the LGA was invited in to test if RBWM’s ‘governance arrangements support its new operating model to deliver on the council’s ambitions’. Allow me to translate: basically, where does the accountability lie as the council changes from being a service provider to one that outsources services to other providers/companies?

One of the key areas looked at was its interaction with the public. And here all four wheels came off the wagon at once.

The RBWM Action Group, arch critics of the handling of the BLP process, had arranged to meet the peer review group – only to have the council’s MD intervene and cancel the meeting at the last minute. The same happened to a meeting arranged with a couple of councillors ‘at odds’ with the leadership – though I hear this went ahead away from the town hall.

Such controlling conduct undermines the entire purpose of the review. But then, when you hear RBWM can pick and choose which bits to make public – if any – the whole review is revealed as a rather meaningless tick-box exercise anyway.

The gun-toting cowboys at the town hall seem as intent as ever on shooting themselves in the foot.

Comments

Leave your comment

Share your opinions on

Characters left: 1500

comment

  • DerekRSmith

    07:07, 10 October 2017

    Well done Martin. Again the advertiser highlights the importance of a free press. I have lived in Maidenhead for forty years and cannot remember a time where a council regime was so disliked and mistrusted. This demonstrates what happens when you do not have an effective opposition because when you do it acts as a check and balance on those who would ride rough shod over the voters needs. Increasingly in this age we have lost sight of the fact that you aspire to public office to serve the community not your own personal ambitions!

    Reply

    Report

    • floboo

      18:06, 12 October 2017

      Well said Roger

      Reply

      Report

    • Welshdragon

      13:01, 10 October 2017

      People need to vote for someone else then

      Reply

      Report

Most Shared

Most Commented

Top Ten Articles