Councillors consider 'close pass' undercover police cycling safety scheme

Undercover police cyclist operations designed to encourage motorists to leave more room when overtaking bicycles were discussed at the Royal Borough’s Cycle Forum.

A report sent to councillors looked at the ‘close pass initiative’ developed by West Midlands Police, where an officer cycles in plain clothes and videos drivers not giving sufficient room to overtake.

They then alert an officer in a car who pulls the driver over. The motorist is shown the video and given a choice of prosecution or taking part in a short educational session.

The scheme has been linked to a 20 per cent reduction in cyclist casualties there, and has since been adopted by other police forces.

The Cycle Forum has written to Thames Valley Police (TVP), which revealed it runs the close pass initiative with Hampshire Police, but mostly targets places with high rates of cyclist casualties – Oxford, Portsmouth and Southampton.

However, cyclist casualty data in the Royal Borough is being analysed by TVP which will determine if the scheme is justified here.

At Monday’s meeting (April 9), Cllr Malcolm Beer (Ind, Old Windsor) voiced concerns about the Royal Borough’s narrow ‘horse and cart’ routes and said: “The whole concept is a very good one, but whether we can actually implement it on our roads, I have serious doubts.”

He added that it could increase tensions between motorists and cyclists.

“I just think the government should run a safety campaign,” Cllr Lynda Yong (Con, Sunninghill and South Ascot) said.

The report, which was endorsed by councillors, suggests the purchase of leaflets, multimedia content and a close pass mat demonstrating the room needed to pass cyclists safely, which could be used at public events.

Drivers should give 1.5 metres of space between their car and a cyclist.

The forum also heard evidence about how a public bike share scheme could be introduced in the borough, which will be considered by the Highways Transport and Environment Overview and Scrutiny Panel.


Leave your comment

Share your opinions on

Characters left: 1500


  • Deepdive

    15:03, 13 April 2018

    Sounds like Welshdragon and Pursuer need to get on a bike themselves to see how vulnerable you feel when cycling on the road, and then perhaps better understand better why some cyclists may choose to use the pavement, or ride in groups. I wouldn't condone any illegal behaviour by any road user, provided you judge as harshly speeding drivers, using mobile phones, and not indicating to name but a few of the offences I bear witness to on the roads every day. Incidentally to ride in a group two abreast is not illegal, perhaps take a look at the highway code, it also makes passing cyclists easier, and safer.



  • Welshdragon

    14:02, 12 April 2018

    any chance the same could be done to catch cyclists riding 2 or 3 abreast and swerving all over the place, jumping red lights and riding on pavements? or doesn't that make any money?



  • Pursuer

    11:11, 12 April 2018

    What about thought being given to cyclists illegally riding on footpaths (& in pedestrianised areas). On more that one occasion I have exited my garden gate & been almost struck by a cyclist. There is a shared facility on the other side of the road, constructed at enormous expense which is barely used by cyclists. It is fair comment to record that pointing out the facility & the illegality of cycling on a footpath results in more often than not in the receipt of foul abuse. I do recall one occasion when a lady apologised for a 'near miss' but in her defence said that using the dedicated shared facility meant that she had to cross the road to get to it & that was inconvenient.



Most Recent

Most read

Top Ten Articles